When
contemplating on what spaces I use – and what spaces I find engaging I thought
of so many buildings. I live in a
historic neighborhood in Detroit, I assisted in saving a historic downtown
building that is now cooperatively owned by grassroots organizations –and is
also the best example of neo-gothic architecture . My grandfather built many parts of Detroit –
from artistic rod iron on churches – to brute structures on skyscrapers.
So,
while I am completely in love with Detroit architecture I ultimately came back
to my last “Creative I” module were I expressed how my creativity often stems
from natural spaces. I start my blog with
a comedic clip that came to mind as I was photographing the space. I love the use of comedy in creativity – and
really appreciate the way it has been used in this class. Though the comedy clip suggests that natural
spaces just happen and there is little to no ‘architecture’ in nature. But as I spent more time in the space I
reminded myself that, in an age of human dominance over nature, every natural
space is practically (if not completely) planned.
My
space is Voight park. It is right across
from my home and while it has no ‘human’ features other then regular city
mowers and a wood marker (that gets plowed over about every two years by a
maintenance crew or careless driver), this space has been a fishing hole,
hide-and-seek haven, balance beams, dog chases, pirate ships, castaway island,
treaser seekers, leaf dug-outs, tree climbers, and a bunch of other activities
I don’t remember (or couldn’t quite figure out what was going on) for my son
and all the neighborhood kids. The main
function of this space for me, while I and other adults draw a tremendous
amount of solice from it as well as creativity, is an antidote for children’s
NDD. Nature deficit
disorder refers to the
phrase coined by Richard Louv in his 2005 book Last Child in the Woods that
human beings, especially children, are spending less time outdoors resulting in
a wide range of behavioral problems.
Lessons Learned from “A Room of their own”:
“Given the chance to
introduce new technologies in classroom or other learning contexts, designers
of learning environments often ignore what their users are telling them. More
importantly they may ignore what users actually do–how they think, work, learn
or behave. This tension between top-down expert design and more organic
user-driven design processes (that sometimes even subvert the intentions of the
designer) is not unique to educational technology. It is a theme that has
played out over and over again in other design professions (Mishra 2013)”
In community
organizing I find the theme of hierarchical planning frustrating as well. Too often the community is the last to be
informed of plans that will affect them.
And rarely, if ever, are they included into the designing of plans.
The story of Brasilia
as described in “A Room of one’s own”, described as hauntingly beautiful,
sounds haunting familiar as well. The plan
for Detroit Future City (The urban plan for the city of Detroit 2015 plus 50
years) has the same Brasiliaesque people void.
And most explicitly – void of the people that are currently living
there.
Inspired by the DFC
plan, corporations have sponsored a variety of ‘community visioning’
projects. Recently Detroit Edison Energy
(DTE) put up a number of large chalk boards around my neighborhood. With the words, “what would you like to see
here?”. Some were in front of abonded
homes or vacant lots. Some oddly close
to neighbors. I was driving at the time
but thought they would be a cool visual to capture in picture. As I was driving I saw neighbors looking
suspiciously at the signs and one seemingly upset mom and pop shop owner grab
his own chalk and wrote in large letters across the board near his sweet tooth
business, “SWEET TOOTH EXPANSION”. When
I went back to take a picture of the boards two hours later, a DTE employees
was already taking them down. A group of
suburban college kids had already driven in and scrawled all kinds of pictures
and ideas on the boards. I asked if I
could get a picure of the boards before he loaded them all into a pick up
truck. He yelled NO at me. I tried to explain that I live here – that
this is my neighborhood and I just thought they were kind of cool. He shrugged and did his best to block while
loading. There is a bizzaire trend in urban
planning – where there IS community input – but not by the people currently
living in the ‘planned’ locations. It’s
an imagined community, an imported community or a settler community.
One of the most
inspiring creative planned spaces I have been part of was a collaboration with
the Detroit Public Schools and some very creative landscape architects (and I
realize I’m getting well over 200 words here – sorry!). We worked with 4 schools in Detroit and the
architects came in to work just with the kids to design whatever kind of space
they wanted to see outdoors – and the architects found the funds to implement
the plans! We ended up with a meditation
garden (shaped like a labyrinth), an aquaponics hoop house, a pizza garden, a
garden for jams that the kids wanted to create a business out of…
References:
Louv, R. 2008. Last
Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder.
Algonquin Paperbacks. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
Mishra, Punya, William Cain, Sandra Sawaya, Danah Henriksen, and the Deep-Play Research Group. 2013. “Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: A Room of Their Own.” TechTrends 57 (4). Springer US: 5–9.
Mishra, Punya, William Cain, Sandra Sawaya, Danah Henriksen, and the Deep-Play Research Group. 2013. “Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: A Room of Their Own.” TechTrends 57 (4). Springer US: 5–9.
No comments:
Post a Comment